Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Ford 650 Backhoe loader
FordModel B
Ford 650 Backhoe loader
Specialized
- power
- 75.5 hp
- displacement
- 256 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
FordFord 650 Backhoe loader
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 650 Backhoe loader higher · +4.5 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
650 Backhoe loader75.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 650 Backhoe loader is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 650 Backhoe loader higher · +12 ci (+5%)GT65244 ci
650 Backhoe loader256 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 650 Backhoe loader is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
650 Backhoe loader4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 650 Backhoe loader is in the 50th · 5,720 models
GT65 (A)650 Backhoe loader (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Ford | — |
| Model | GT65 | 650 Backhoe loader | — |
| Category | Utility | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Ford | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75.5hp | ▲ 650 Backhoe loader+4.5 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 256ci | ▲ 650 Backhoe loader+12 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ 650 Backhoe loader+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.2in | ▲ GT65+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open operator station with four-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 73rd percentile (256 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · GT65B · 650 Backhoe loaderMedian Utility Tractor