Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Hurlimann H-372
Image not recorded
HurlimannModel B
Hurlimann H-372
Utility
- power
- 70 hp
- displacement
- 183 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
HurlimannHurlimann H-372
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
H-37270 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; H-372 is in the 63rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +61 ci (+33%)GT65244 ci
H-372183 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; H-372 is in the 50th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
H-3723
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; H-372 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
H-37216
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; H-372 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)H-372 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Hurlimann H-372 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Hurlimann | — |
| Model | GT65 | H-372 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Hurlimann H-372 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | SAME | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 70hp | ▲ GT65+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ H-372+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 183ci | ▲ GT65+61 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Hurlimann H-372 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Hurlimann H-372 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 154in | ▲ H-372+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 96.1in | ▲ GT65+9.9 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,063lb | ▲ H-372+728 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Hurlimann H-372 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Hurlimann H-372 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Hurlimann H-372 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Hurlimann H-372 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Hurlimann H-372 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 63rd percentile (70 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 50th percentile (183 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 57th percentile (6,063 lb)
A · GT65B · H-372Median Utility Tractor