Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs IMT 285
Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
IMTIMT 285
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 285 higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
28575 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 285 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 285 higher · +4 ci (+2%)GT65244 ci
285248 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 285 is in the 70th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
2854
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 285 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +8 (+100%)GT6516
2858
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 285 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)285 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | IMT | — |
| Model | GT65 | 285 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Not recorded | A4-248 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ 285+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ GT65+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 248ci | ▲ 285+4 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Sliding spur | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.7in | 81.6in | ▲ 285+4.9 in · +6% |
| Height | 106in | 99.6in | ▲ GT65+6.4 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,199lb | ▲ 285+864 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | Not recorded | 63.4hp | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | 3-point | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 4,910lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 70th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,199 lb)
A · GT65B · 285Median Utility Tractor