Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Kubota M1-75
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M1-75
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 264 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
KubotaKubota M1-75
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ M1-75 higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
M1-7575 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; M1-75 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ M1-75 higher · +20 ci (+8%)GT65244 ci
M1-75264 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; M1-75 is in the 74th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
M1-754
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; M1-75 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ M1-75 higher · +2 (+13%)GT6516
M1-7518
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; M1-75 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)M1-75 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M1-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Kubota | — |
| Model | GT65 | M1-75 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M1-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V4302 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ M1-75+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ M1-75+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 264ci | ▲ M1-75+20 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ M1-75+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M1-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M1-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 151in | ▲ GT65+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 76.7in | 69.3in | ▲ GT65+7.4 in · +11% |
| Height | 106in | 99.2in | ▲ GT65+6.8 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,504lb | ▲ M1-75+1,169 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M1-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M1-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | JIS1 | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M1-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M1-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M1-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 74th percentile (264 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 62nd percentile (6,504 lb)
A · GT65B · M1-75Median Utility Tractor