Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Kubota M4N-071HDRC12
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M4N-071HDRC12
Utility
- power
- 72.6 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
KubotaKubota M4N-071HDRC12
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ M4N-071HDRC12 higher · +1.6 hp (+2%)GT6571 hp
M4N-071HDRC1272.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; M4N-071HDRC12 is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
M4N-071HDRC124
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; M4N-071HDRC12 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +4 (+33%)GT6516
M4N-071HDRC1212
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; M4N-071HDRC12 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ M4N-071HDRC12 higher · +287 lb (+5%)GT655,335 lb
M4N-071HDRC125,622 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; M4N-071HDRC12 is in the 53rd · 5,107 models
GT65 (A)M4N-071HDRC12 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Kubota | — |
| Model | GT65 | M4N-071HDRC12 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V3800-TIEF4 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 72.6hp | ▲ M4N-071HDRC12+1.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ M4N-071HDRC12+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.7in | 49.2in | ▲ GT65+27.5 in · +56% |
| Height | 106in | 91.2in | ▲ GT65+14.8 in · +16% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 5,622lb | ▲ M4N-071HDRC12+287 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Rigid lower link, easy adjust stabilizers | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,307lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Emissions
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | DPF, DOC | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4N-071HDRC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 65th percentile (72.6 hp)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 53rd percentile (5,622 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 74th percentile (76.7 in)B · 16th percentile (49.2 in)
A · GT65B · M4N-071HDRC12Median Utility Tractor