Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Kubota MZ75
Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
KubotaKubota MZ75
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MZ75 higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
MZ7574 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; MZ75 is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +42 ci (+21%)GT65244 ci
MZ75202 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; MZ75 is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
MZ754
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; MZ75 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MZ75 higher · +8 (+50%)GT6516
MZ7524
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; MZ75 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)MZ75 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota MZ75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Kubota | — |
| Model | GT65 | MZ75 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota MZ75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V3300-T | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 74hp | ▲ MZ75+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ MZ75+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 202ci | ▲ GT65+42 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota MZ75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota MZ75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 143in | ▲ GT65+9 in · +6% |
| Width | 76.7in | 68.1in | ▲ GT65+8.6 in · +13% |
| Height | 106in | 98.4in | ▲ GT65+7.6 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 5,688lb | ▲ MZ75+353 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota MZ75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota MZ75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota MZ75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota MZ75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota MZ75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 55th percentile (202 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 53rd percentile (5,688 lb)
A · GT65B · MZ75Median Utility Tractor