Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Leyland 270
Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
LeylandLeyland 270
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 270 higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
27075 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 270 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +14 ci (+6%)GT65244 ci
270230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 270 is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
2704
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 270 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +6 (+60%)GT6516
27010
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 270 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)270 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Leyland | — |
| Model | GT65 | 270 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Leyland | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4/98 NT | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ 270+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 230ci | ▲ GT65+14 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 270+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 134in | ▲ GT65+18 in · +13% |
| Width | 76.7in | 68.5in | ▲ GT65+8.2 in · +12% |
| Height | 106in | 95.6in | ▲ GT65+10.4 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 5,743lb | ▲ 270+408 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power assist | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power assist | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,743 lb)
A · GT65B · 270Median Utility Tractor