Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Leyland 472
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
LeylandLeyland 472
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedGT6571 hp
47271 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 472 is in the 64th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +14 ci (+6%)GT65244 ci
472230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 472 is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
4724
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 472 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +7 (+78%)GT6516
4729
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 472 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)472 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 472 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Leyland | — |
| Model | GT65 | 472 | — |
| Category | Utility | Not recorded | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 472 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Leyland | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 71hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 230ci | ▲ GT65+14 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 472+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 472 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 472 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 134in | ▲ GT65+18 in · +13% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 106in | Same |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 83.3in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 7,410lb | ▲ 472+2,075 lb · +39% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 472 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 472 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4-28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 472 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 472 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 472 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Leyland 472 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 64th percentile (71 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 71st percentile (7,410 lb)
A · GT65B · 472Median Utility Tractor