Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Lindner Geotrac 73
Image not recorded
LindnerModel B
Lindner Geotrac 73
Utility
- power
- 74 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
LindnerLindner Geotrac 73
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Geotrac 73 higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
Geotrac 7374 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +43 ci (+21%)GT65244 ci
Geotrac 73201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
Geotrac 733
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
Geotrac 7316
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)Geotrac 73 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Lindner | — |
| Model | GT65 | Geotrac 73 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1103 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 74hp | ▲ Geotrac 73+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 201ci | ▲ GT65+43 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ Geotrac 73+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 149in | ▲ GT65+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 76.7in | 77.6in | ▲ Geotrac 73+0.9 in · +1% |
| Height | 106in | 96.5in | ▲ GT65+9.5 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,505lb | ▲ Geotrac 73+1,170 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 62nd percentile (6,505 lb)
A · GT65B · Geotrac 73Median Utility Tractor