Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs LS XU6168

AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
LSLS XU6168
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
XU616868 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; XU6168 is in the 61st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +91 ci (+59%)GT65244 ci
XU6168153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; XU6168 is in the 40th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
XU61684
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; XU6168 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
XU616816
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; XU6168 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)XU6168 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | LS XU6168 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | LS | — |
| Model | GT65 | XU6168 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | LS XU6168 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | LS | — |
| Model | Not recorded | L4C25-T | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 68hp | ▲ GT65+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ XU6168+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 153ci | ▲ GT65+91 ci · +59% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.5in | ▲ GT65+0.6 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ GT65+0.4 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | LS XU6168 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Synchronized shuttle and power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | LS XU6168 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 139in | ▲ GT65+13 in · +9% |
| Width | 76.7in | 70in | ▲ GT65+6.7 in · +10% |
| Height | 106in | 103in | ▲ GT65+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 4,674lb | ▲ GT65+661 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | LS XU6168 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | LS XU6168 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | LS XU6168 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD - Mechanical Front Wheel Drive | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | LS XU6168 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | LS XU6168 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 61st percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 40th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 45th percentile (4,674 lb)
A · GT65B · XU6168Median Utility Tractor