Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Massey Ferguson 3625F
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 3625F
Utility
- power
- 69 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 3625F
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +2 hp (+3%)GT6571 hp
3625F69 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 3625F is in the 62nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +43 ci (+21%)GT65244 ci
3625F201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 3625F is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
3625F3
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 3625F is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +4 (+33%)GT6516
3625F12
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 3625F is in the 50th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)3625F (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 3625F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | GT65 | 3625F | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 3625F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 33DTA | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 69hp | ▲ GT65+2 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 201ci | ▲ GT65+43 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 3625F+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ 3625F+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 3625F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 3625F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 157in | ▲ 3625F+5 in · +3% |
| Width | 76.7in | 57.1in | ▲ GT65+19.6 in · +34% |
| Height | 106in | 90.6in | ▲ GT65+15.4 in · +17% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,559lb | ▲ 3625F+1,224 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 3625F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 3625F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 3625F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 3625F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 3625F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab (optional), ROPS (Roll Over Protection Structure) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 62nd percentile (69 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 62nd percentile (6,559 lb)
A · GT65B · 3625FMedian Utility Tractor