Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Massey Ferguson 384S
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 384S
Agricultural
- power
- 72 hp
- displacement
- 236 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 384S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 384S higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
384S72 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 384S is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +8 ci (+3%)GT65244 ci
384S236 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 384S is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
384S4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 384S is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 384S higher · +8 (+50%)GT6516
384S24
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 384S is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)384S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | GT65 | 384S | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | A4.236 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 72hp | ▲ 384S+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 236ci | ▲ GT65+8 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 384S+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Synchro, Shuttle, Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 136in | ▲ GT65+16 in · +12% |
| Width | 76.7in | 53.5in | ▲ GT65+23.2 in · +43% |
| Height | 106in | 89in | ▲ GT65+17 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 5,181lb | ▲ GT65+154 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 65th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 65th percentile (236 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 49th percentile (5,181 lb)
A · GT65B · 384SMedian Utility Tractor