Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Massey Ferguson 387
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 387
Agricultural
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 236 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 387
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedGT6571 hp
38771 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 387 is in the 64th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +8 ci (+3%)GT65244 ci
387236 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 387 is in the 64th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
3874
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 387 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 387 higher · +8 (+50%)GT6516
38724
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 387 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)387 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 387 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | GT65 | 387 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 387 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | A4.236 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 71hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 236ci | ▲ GT65+8 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 387+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 387 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 387 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 152in | Same |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 105in | ▲ GT65+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 8,026lb | ▲ 387+2,691 lb · +50% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 387 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 387 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 387 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 387 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 387 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 64th percentile (71 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 64th percentile (236 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,026 lb)
A · GT65B · 387Median Utility Tractor