Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Mitsubishi GCR75
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GCR75
Utility
- power
- 74 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GCR75
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GCR75 higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
GCR7574 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; GCR75 is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +41 ci (+20%)GT65244 ci
GCR75203 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; GCR75 is in the 56th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
GCR754
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; GCR75 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ GCR75 higher · +2,646 lb (+50%)GT655,335 lb
GCR757,981 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; GCR75 is in the 75th · 5,107 models
GT65 (A)GCR75 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Mitsubishi GCR75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | GT65 | GCR75 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Mitsubishi GCR75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S4S-DT | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 74hp | ▲ GCR75+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ GCR75+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 203ci | ▲ GT65+41 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.7in | ▲ GT65+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ GCR75+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Mitsubishi GCR75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Mitsubishi GCR75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 153in | ▲ GCR75+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 76.7in | 70.9in | ▲ GT65+5.8 in · +8% |
| Height | 106in | 101in | ▲ GT65+5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 7,981lb | ▲ GCR75+2,646 lb · +50% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Mitsubishi GCR75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Mitsubishi GCR75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | JISII/JISI | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Mitsubishi GCR75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Mitsubishi GCR75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Mitsubishi GCR75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 56th percentile (203 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 75th percentile (7,981 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 67th percentile (152 in)B · 69th percentile (153 in)
A · GT65B · GCR75Median Utility Tractor