Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs New Holland TK4.80F
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TK4.80F
Utility
- power
- 74 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
New HollandNew Holland TK4.80F
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TK4.80F higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
TK4.80F74 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; TK4.80F is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
TK4.80F16
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; TK4.80F is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Width
▲ GT65 higher · +21.7 in (+39%)GT6576.7 in
TK4.80F55 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in
GT65 is in the 74th percentile; TK4.80F is in the 27th · 3,933 models
GT65 (A)TK4.80F (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4.80F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | New Holland | — |
| Model | GT65 | TK4.80F | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4.80F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | New Holland | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 74hp | ▲ TK4.80F+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TK4.80F+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4.80F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Shuttle, Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4.80F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.7in | 55in | ▲ GT65+21.7 in · +39% |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4.80F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4.80F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4.80F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4.80F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4.80F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Width
median 66 inA · 74th percentile (76.7 in)B · 27th percentile (55 in)
A · GT65B · TK4.80FMedian Utility Tractor