Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs New Holland TK4030
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TK4030
Utility
- power
- 76.4 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
New HollandNew Holland TK4030
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TK4030 higher · +5.4 hp (+8%)GT6571 hp
TK403076.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; TK4030 is in the 69th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +49 ci (+25%)GT65244 ci
TK4030195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; TK4030 is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
TK40304
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; TK4030 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
TK403016
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; TK4030 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)TK4030 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | New Holland | — |
| Model | GT65 | TK4030 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | FPT | — |
| Model | Not recorded | F5C | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 76.4hp | ▲ TK4030+5.4 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TK4030+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 195ci | ▲ GT65+49 ci · +25% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ GT65+0.4 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Unsynchronized, Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 125in | ▲ GT65+27 in · +22% |
| Width | 76.7in | 57.1in | ▲ GT65+19.6 in · +34% |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 7,231lb | ▲ TK4030+1,896 lb · +36% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | New Holland TK4030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 69th percentile (76.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 69th percentile (7,231 lb)
A · GT65B · TK4030Median Utility Tractor