Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Renault 94
RenaultModel B
Renault 94
Agricultural
- power
- 72 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
RenaultRenault 94
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 94 higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
9472 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 94 is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +36 ci (+17%)GT65244 ci
94208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 94 is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
944
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 94 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +8 (+100%)GT6516
948
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 94 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)94 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Renault 94 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Renault | — |
| Model | GT65 | 94 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Renault 94 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | MWM | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D326-4 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 72hp | ▲ 94+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 94+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 208ci | ▲ GT65+36 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.7in | ▲ GT65+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ 94+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Renault 94 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Renault 94 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 161in | ▲ 94+9 in · +6% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,935lb | ▲ 94+1,600 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Renault 94 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Mechanical | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Renault 94 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Renault 94 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Mechanical | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Renault 94 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Renault 94 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 65th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 66th percentile (6,935 lb)
A · GT65B · 94Median Utility Tractor