Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs SAME Mercury 75
Image not recorded
SAMEModel B
SAME Mercury 75
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
SAMESAME Mercury 75
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Mercury 75 higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
Mercury 7575 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; Mercury 75 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Mercury 75 higher · +10 ci (+4%)GT65244 ci
Mercury 75254 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; Mercury 75 is in the 71st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
Mercury 754
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; Mercury 75 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +4 (+33%)GT6516
Mercury 7512
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; Mercury 75 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)Mercury 75 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | SAME Mercury 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | SAME | — |
| Model | GT65 | Mercury 75 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | SAME Mercury 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | SAME | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ Mercury 75+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 254ci | ▲ Mercury 75+10 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ Mercury 75+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | SAME Mercury 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | SAME Mercury 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | SAME Mercury 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | SAME Mercury 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | SAME Mercury 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | SAME Mercury 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | SAME Mercury 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 71st percentile (254 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
A · GT65B · Mercury 75Median Utility Tractor