Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Shibaura SE7300
ShibauraModel B
Shibaura SE7300
Tractor
- power
- 73 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
ShibauraShibaura SE7300
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ SE7300 higher · +2 hp (+3%)GT6571 hp
SE730073 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; SE7300 is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Operating Weight
▲ SE7300 higher · +2,409 lb (+45%)GT655,335 lb
SE73007,744 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; SE7300 is in the 73rd · 5,107 models
Length
▲ GT65 higher · +3 in (+2%)GT65152 in
SE7300149 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
GT65 is in the 67th percentile; SE7300 is in the 65th · 4,659 models
Width
▲ SE7300 higher · +3.3 in (+4%)GT6576.7 in
SE730080 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in
GT65 is in the 74th percentile; SE7300 is in the 82nd · 3,933 models
GT65 (A)SE7300 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Shibaura SE7300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Shibaura | — |
| Model | GT65 | SE7300 | — |
| Category | Utility | Not recorded | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Shibaura SE7300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Shibaura | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 73hp | ▲ SE7300+2 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Shibaura SE7300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Shibaura SE7300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 149in | ▲ GT65+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 76.7in | 80in | ▲ SE7300+3.3 in · +4% |
| Height | 106in | 104in | ▲ GT65+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 7,744lb | ▲ SE7300+2,409 lb · +45% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Shibaura SE7300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Shibaura SE7300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Shibaura SE7300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Shibaura SE7300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Shibaura SE7300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (73 hp)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 73rd percentile (7,744 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 67th percentile (152 in)B · 65th percentile (149 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 74th percentile (76.7 in)B · 82nd percentile (80 in)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 79th percentile (106 in)B · 75th percentile (104 in)
A · GT65B · SE7300Median Utility Tractor