Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Steyr 3709F
Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
SteyrSteyr 3709F
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 3709F higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
3709F72 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 3709F is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +65 ci (+36%)GT65244 ci
3709F179 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 3709F is in the 47th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
3709F3
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 3709F is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
3709F16
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 3709F is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)3709F (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr 3709F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Steyr | — |
| Model | GT65 | 3709F | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr 3709F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Not recorded | TR14396-2000/25/EC | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 72hp | ▲ 3709F+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 3709F+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 179ci | ▲ GT65+65 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr 3709F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | STEYR Synchro Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr 3709F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 11.3in | ▲ GT65+141 in · +1245% |
| Width | 76.7in | 91.2in | ▲ 3709F+14.5 in · +19% |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,283lb | ▲ 3709F+948 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr 3709F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr 3709F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr 3709F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr 3709F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr 3709F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 65th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 47th percentile (179 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 60th percentile (6,283 lb)
A · GT65B · 3709FMedian Utility Tractor