Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Steyr M 975
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr M 975
Tractor
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
SteyrSteyr M 975
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ M 975 higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
M 97575 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; M 975 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
M 9753
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; M 975 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
M 97516
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; M 975 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ M 975 higher · +1,214 lb (+23%)GT655,335 lb
M 9756,549 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; M 975 is in the 62nd · 5,107 models
GT65 (A)M 975 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr M 975 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Steyr | — |
| Model | GT65 | M 975 | — |
| Category | Utility | Not recorded | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr M 975 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Multiple Unresolved Listings (MWM/Sisu) | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ M 975+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ M 975+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ M 975+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ M 975+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr M 975 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr M 975 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 149in | ▲ GT65+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 98.4in | ▲ GT65+7.6 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,549lb | ▲ M 975+1,214 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr M 975 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr M 975 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr M 975 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr M 975 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Steyr M 975 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 62nd percentile (6,549 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 67th percentile (152 in)B · 65th percentile (149 in)
A · GT65B · M 975Median Utility Tractor