Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs TYM T680
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
TYMTYM T680
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
T68068 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; T680 is in the 61st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +65 ci (+36%)GT65244 ci
T680179 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; T680 is in the 48th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
T6803
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; T680 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
T68016
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; T680 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)T680 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM T680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | TYM | — |
| Model | GT65 | T680 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM T680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3029D | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 68hp | ▲ GT65+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ T680+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 179ci | ▲ GT65+65 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ T680+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM T680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM T680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 159in | ▲ T680+7 in · +5% |
| Width | 76.7in | 77.1in | ▲ T680+0.4 in · <1% |
| Height | 106in | 102in | ▲ GT65+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,658lb | ▲ T680+1,323 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM T680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM T680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM T680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM T680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM T680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 61st percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 48th percentile (179 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 63rd percentile (6,658 lb)
A · GT65B · T680Median Utility Tractor