Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs TYM TX753

AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
TYMTYM TX753
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TX753 higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
TX75375 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; TX753 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +45 ci (+23%)GT65244 ci
TX753199 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; TX753 is in the 53rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
TX7534
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; TX753 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ TX753 higher · +8 (+50%)GT6516
TX75324
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; TX753 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)TX753 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM TX753 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | TYM | — |
| Model | GT65 | TX753 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM TX753 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | B3.3 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ TX753+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ TX753+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 199ci | ▲ GT65+45 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.7in | ▲ GT65+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM TX753 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM TX753 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 155in | ▲ TX753+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 76.7in | 76.4in | ▲ GT65+0.3 in · <1% |
| Height | 106in | 107in | ▲ TX753+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,757lb | ▲ TX753+1,422 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM TX753 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM TX753 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM TX753 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM TX753 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | TYM TX753 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 53rd percentile (199 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 64th percentile (6,757 lb)
A · GT65B · TX753Median Utility Tractor