Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Ursus 5312
Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
UrsusUrsus 5312
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
531270 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 5312 is in the 63rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +8 ci (+3%)GT65244 ci
5312236 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 5312 is in the 64th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
53124
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 5312 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
531216
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 5312 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)5312 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ursus 5312 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Ursus | — |
| Model | GT65 | 5312 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ursus 5312 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Ursus | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4390 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 70hp | ▲ GT65+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 236ci | ▲ GT65+8 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 5312+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ursus 5312 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ursus 5312 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 148in | ▲ GT65+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 76.7in | 79.1in | ▲ 5312+2.4 in · +3% |
| Height | 106in | 104in | ▲ GT65+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 7,011lb | ▲ 5312+1,676 lb · +31% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ursus 5312 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ursus 5312 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category II three-point hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ursus 5312 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ursus 5312 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ursus 5312 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ursus 5312 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS option available, Cab option available | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 63rd percentile (70 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 64th percentile (236 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 67th percentile (7,011 lb)
A · GT65B · 5312Median Utility Tractor