Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs UTB/Universal 642
Image not recorded
UTB/UniversalModel B
UTB/Universal 642
Sub-Compact
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 219 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
UTB/UniversalUTB/Universal 642
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
64268 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 642 is in the 61st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +25 ci (+11%)GT65244 ci
642219 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 642 is in the 60th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
6424
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 642 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +8 (+100%)GT6516
6428
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 642 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)642 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | UTB/Universal 642 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | UTB/Universal | — |
| Model | GT65 | 642 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | UTB/Universal 642 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | UTB | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 68hp | ▲ GT65+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 642+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 219ci | ▲ GT65+25 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4in | ▲ GT65+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | UTB/Universal 642 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | UTB/Universal 642 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 134in | ▲ GT65+18 in · +13% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 104in | ▲ GT65+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 7,165lb | ▲ 642+1,830 lb · +34% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | UTB/Universal 642 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | UTB/Universal 642 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | UTB/Universal 642 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | UTB/Universal 642 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | UTB/Universal 642 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 61st percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 60th percentile (219 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 68th percentile (7,165 lb)
A · GT65B · 642Median Utility Tractor