Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Valmet 565
Image not recorded
ValmetModel B
Valmet 565
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
ValmetValmet 565
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 565 higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
56575 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 565 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +43 ci (+21%)GT65244 ci
565201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 565 is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
5653
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 565 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 565 higher · +882 lb (+17%)GT655,335 lb
5656,217 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 565 is in the 59th · 5,107 models
GT65 (A)565 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valmet 565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Valmet | — |
| Model | GT65 | 565 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valmet 565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Valmet | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ 565+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ 565+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 201ci | ▲ GT65+43 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 565+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ 565+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valmet 565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valmet 565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 146in | ▲ GT65+6 in · +4% |
| Width | 76.7in | 79.9in | ▲ 565+3.2 in · +4% |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,217lb | ▲ 565+882 lb · +17% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valmet 565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valmet 565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valmet 565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valmet 565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valmet 565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,217 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 67th percentile (152 in)B · 62nd percentile (146 in)
A · GT65B · 565Median Utility Tractor