Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Valpadana 5070
ValpadanaModel B
Valpadana 5070
Utility
- power
- 70 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
ValpadanaValpadana 5070
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
507070 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 5070 is in the 63rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +41 ci (+20%)GT65244 ci
5070203 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 5070 is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
50704
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 5070 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
507016
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 5070 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)5070 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valpadana 5070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Valpadana | — |
| Model | GT65 | 5070 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valpadana 5070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4TNV98L-NLAN | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 70hp | ▲ GT65+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 203ci | ▲ GT65+41 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valpadana 5070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Shuttle/Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valpadana 5070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.7in | 52.6in | ▲ GT65+24.1 in · +46% |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,283lb | ▲ 5070+948 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valpadana 5070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valpadana 5070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 2/1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valpadana 5070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valpadana 5070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Valpadana 5070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 63rd percentile (70 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 55th percentile (203 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,283 lb)
A · GT65B · 5070Median Utility Tractor