Image not recorded
AgcoModel A
Agco GT65A
Utility
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 20
Head to head · Utility
Agco GT65A vs John Deere 410C
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 410C
Backhoe Loader
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
AgcoAgco GT65A
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 410C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 410C higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT65A71 hp
410C75 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65A is in the 64th percentile; 410C is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 410C higher · +32 ci (+13%)GT65A244 ci
410C276 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65A is in the 69th percentile; 410C is in the 81st · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65A higher · +16 (+400%)GT65A20
410C4
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65A is in the 86th percentile; 410C is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 410C higher · +8,532 lb (+145%)GT65A5,864 lb
410C14,396 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65A is in the 55th percentile; 410C is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
GT65A (A)410C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco GT65A | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | John Deere | — |
| Model | GT65A | 410C | — |
| Category | Utility | Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | Agco GT65A | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4276D | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ 410C+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 276ci | ▲ 410C+32 ci · +13% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco GT65A | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-Shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco GT65A | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 281in | ▲ 410C+129 in · +85% |
| Width | 76.8in | 81.9in | ▲ 410C+5.1 in · +7% |
| Height | 107in | 104in | ▲ GT65A+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 5,864lb | 14,396lb | ▲ 410C+8,532 lb · +145% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agco GT65A | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco GT65A | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Cat II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,520lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco GT65A | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agco GT65A | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agco GT65A | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agco GT65A | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab, ROPS | ROPS canopy | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 81st percentile (276 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 55th percentile (5,864 lb)B · 93rd percentile (14,396 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 68th percentile (152 in)B · 98th percentile (281 in)
A · GT65AB · 410CMedian Utility Tractor