Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT75 vs Schluter Compact 850
Image not recorded
SchluterModel B
Schluter Compact 850
Utility
- power
- 80 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO GT75
vs
SchluterSchluter Compact 850
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT75 higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT7583 hp
Compact 85080 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; Compact 850 is in the 71st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Compact 850 higher · +46 ci (+19%)GT75244 ci
Compact 850290 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT75 is in the 68th percentile; Compact 850 is in the 84th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT754
Compact 8504
Median Utility Tractor4
GT75 is in the 50th percentile; Compact 850 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT75 higher · +4 (+33%)GT7516
Compact 85012
Median Utility Tractor12
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; Compact 850 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
GT75 (A)Compact 850 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Schluter | — |
| Model | GT75 | Compact 850 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Schluter | — |
| Model | Not recorded | SDM 110 W 4 | — |
| Power Output | 83hp | 80hp | ▲ GT75+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ GT75+400 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 290ci | ▲ Compact 850+46 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ Compact 850+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ Compact 850+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 156in | ▲ Compact 850+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 76.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 96.9in | ▲ GT75+9.1 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 5,511lb | 7,574lb | ▲ Compact 850+2,063 lb · +37% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Mechanical | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,530lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Mechanical | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (83 hp)B · 71st percentile (80 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 84th percentile (290 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,511 lb)B · 72nd percentile (7,574 lb)
A · GT75B · Compact 850Median Utility Tractor