Head to head · Utility
AGCO LT75 vs Schluter Compact 850
Image not recorded
SchluterModel B
Schluter Compact 850
Utility
- power
- 80 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO LT75
vs
SchluterSchluter Compact 850
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Compact 850 higher · +1 hp (+1%)LT7579 hp
Compact 85080 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
LT75 is in the 70th percentile; Compact 850 is in the 71st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Compact 850 higher · +16 ci (+6%)LT75274 ci
Compact 850290 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
LT75 is in the 79th percentile; Compact 850 is in the 84th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedLT754
Compact 8504
Median Utility Tractor4
LT75 is in the 50th percentile; Compact 850 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ LT75 higher · +4 (+33%)LT7516
Compact 85012
Median Utility Tractor12
LT75 is in the 73rd percentile; Compact 850 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
LT75 (A)Compact 850 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Schluter | — |
| Model | LT75 | Compact 850 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Schluter | — |
| Model | Not recorded | SDM 110 W 4 | — |
| Power Output | 79hp | 80hp | ▲ Compact 850+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,201RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ LT75+401 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 290ci | ▲ Compact 850+16 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ Compact 850+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.9in | ▲ LT75+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (2) range operator controlled powershift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 156in | ▲ LT75+10 in · +6% |
| Height | 110in | 96.9in | ▲ LT75+13.1 in · +14% |
| Wheelbase | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 9,600lb | 7,574lb | ▲ LT75+2,026 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power steering | Mechanical | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 14.9R24 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R34 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 7,817lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist (4WD) | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power steering | Mechanical | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12-volt electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 70th percentile (79 hp)B · 71st percentile (80 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 84th percentile (290 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 84th percentile (9,600 lb)B · 72nd percentile (7,574 lb)
A · LT75B · Compact 850Median Utility Tractor