Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO LT90A vs CaseIH Farmall 105V
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 105V
Row Crop
- power
- 106 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 32
AGCOAGCO LT90A
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 105V
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ LT90A higher · +4 hp (+4%)LT90A110 hp
Farmall 105V106 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
LT90A is in the 87th percentile; Farmall 105V is in the 86th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 105V higher · +6 ci (+2%)LT90A268 ci
Farmall 105V274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
LT90A is in the 76th percentile; Farmall 105V is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedLT90A4
Farmall 105V4
Median Utility Tractor4
LT90A is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 105V is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 105V higher · +16 (+100%)LT90A16
Farmall 105V32
Median Utility Tractor12
LT90A is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 105V is in the 97th · 4,941 models
LT90A (A)Farmall 105V (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 105V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | LT90A | Farmall 105V | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 105V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 110hp | 106hp | ▲ LT90A+4 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 105V+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 274ci | ▲ Farmall 105V+6 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ LT90A+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.2in | ▲ Farmall 105V+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 105V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 105V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 174in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 42.5in | — |
| Height | 107in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,820lb | 5,979lb | ▲ LT90A+2,841 lb · +48% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 105V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 105V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 105V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 105V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 87th percentile (110 hp)B · 86th percentile (106 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 76th percentile (268 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 97th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 81st percentile (8,820 lb)B · 56th percentile (5,979 lb)
A · LT90AB · Farmall 105VMedian Utility Tractor