Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO LT90A vs Challenger MT535B MFWD
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT535B MFWD
Utility
- power
- 110 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO LT90A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedLT90A110 hp
MT535B MFWD110 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
LT90A is in the 87th percentile; MT535B MFWD is in the 87th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT535B MFWD higher · +135 ci (+50%)LT90A268 ci
MT535B MFWD403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
LT90A is in the 76th percentile; MT535B MFWD is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT535B MFWD higher · +2 (+50%)LT90A4
MT535B MFWD6
Median Utility Tractor4
LT90A is in the 50th percentile; MT535B MFWD is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT535B MFWD higher · +2,662 lb (+30%)LT90A8,820 lb
MT535B MFWD11,482 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
LT90A is in the 81st percentile; MT535B MFWD is in the 89th · 5,107 models
LT90A (A)MT535B MFWD (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | LT90A | MT535B MFWD | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | ACERT | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C6.6 | — |
| Power Output | 110hp | 110hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT535B MFWD+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 268ci | 403ci | ▲ MT535B MFWD+135 ci · +50% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 174in | 184in | ▲ MT535B MFWD+10 in · +6% |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.6in | — |
| Height | 107in | 113in | ▲ MT535B MFWD+6 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 8,820lb | 11,482lb | ▲ MT535B MFWD+2,662 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3-Point | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 10,915lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Start | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS/FOPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 87th percentile (110 hp)B · 87th percentile (110 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 76th percentile (268 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 81st percentile (8,820 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,482 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 88th percentile (174 in)B · 91st percentile (184 in)
A · LT90AB · MT535B MFWDMedian Utility Tractor