Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT535B MFWD
Utility
- power
- 110 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT535B MFWD vs Ursus 1234
UrsusModel B
Ursus 1234
Agricultural
- power
- 118 hp
- displacement
- 416 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT535B MFWD
vs
UrsusUrsus 1234
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1234 higher · +8 hp (+7%)MT535B MFWD110 hp
1234118 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT535B MFWD is in the 87th percentile; 1234 is in the 89th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1234 higher · +13 ci (+3%)MT535B MFWD403 ci
1234416 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT535B MFWD is in the 90th percentile; 1234 is in the 92nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT535B MFWD6
12346
Median Utility Tractor4
MT535B MFWD is in the 93rd percentile; 1234 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT535B MFWD higher · +238 lb (+2%)MT535B MFWD11,482 lb
123411,244 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT535B MFWD is in the 89th percentile; 1234 is in the 89th · 5,107 models
MT535B MFWD (A)1234 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ursus | — |
| Model | MT535B MFWD | 1234 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | ACERT | Zetor | — |
| Model | C6.6 | Z 8701.12 | — |
| Power Output | 110hp | 118hp | ▲ 1234+8 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 403ci | 416ci | ▲ 1234+13 ci · +3% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Auto Power | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 184in | 177in | ▲ MT535B MFWD+7 in · +4% |
| Width | 81.6in | 89.3in | ▲ 1234+7.7 in · +9% |
| Height | 113in | 118in | ▲ 1234+5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 11,482lb | 11,244lb | ▲ MT535B MFWD+238 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9-24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4-34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3-Point | Category III | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 10,915lb | 12,126lb | ▲ 1234+1,211 lb · +11% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Start | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.8gal | 6.9gal | ▲ 1234+0.1 gal · +1% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Ursus 1234 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS/FOPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 87th percentile (110 hp)B · 89th percentile (118 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (403 ci)B · 92nd percentile (416 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 89th percentile (11,482 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,244 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 91st percentile (184 in)B · 89th percentile (177 in)
A · MT535B MFWDB · 1234Median Utility Tractor