AGCOModel A
AGCO RT100
Row Crop
- power
- 128 hp
- displacement
- 408 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT100 vs CaseIH Puma 130
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 130
Row Crop
- power
- 131 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO RT100
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 130
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 130 higher · +3 hp (+2%)RT100128 hp
Puma 130131 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT100 is in the 44th percentile; Puma 130 is in the 46th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 130 higher · +3 ci (<1%)RT100408 ci
Puma 130411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT100 is in the 57th percentile; Puma 130 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1006
Puma 1306
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT100 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 130 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ RT100 higher · +1,455 lb (+11%)RT10015,055 lb
Puma 13013,600 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
RT100 is in the 67th percentile; Puma 130 is in the 60th · 1,350 models
RT100 (A)Puma 130 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | CaseIH Puma 130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT100 | Puma 130 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | CaseIH Puma 130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 128hp | 131hp | ▲ Puma 130+3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 408ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 130+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | CaseIH Puma 130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | CaseIH Puma 130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 61.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,055lb | 13,600lb | ▲ RT100+1,455 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | CaseIH Puma 130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | CaseIH Puma 130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | 2/3N | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | CaseIH Puma 130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | CaseIH Puma 130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | CaseIH Puma 130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 44th percentile (128 hp)B · 46th percentile (131 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 57th percentile (408 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 67th percentile (15,055 lb)B · 60th percentile (13,600 lb)
A · RT100B · Puma 130Median Row Crop Tractor