Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT115 vs CaseIH Farmall 120M
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 120M
Utility
- power
- 120 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO RT115
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 120M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ RT115 higher · +1 hp (<1%)RT115121 hp
Farmall 120M120 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; Farmall 120M is in the 39th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ RT115 higher · +152 ci (+73%)RT115359 ci
Farmall 120M207 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; Farmall 120M is in the 10th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ RT115 higher · +2 (+50%)RT1156
Farmall 120M4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT115 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 120M is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ RT115 higher · +16 (+100%)RT11532
Farmall 120M16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
RT115 is in the 91st percentile; Farmall 120M is in the 50th · 1,200 models
RT115 (A)Farmall 120M (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Farmall 120M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT115 | Farmall 120M | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Farmall 120M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | FPT | — |
| Model | B5.9T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 121hp | 120hp | ▲ RT115+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ RT115+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 359ci | 207ci | ▲ RT115+152 ci · +73% |
| Bore | 4in | 3.9in | ▲ RT115+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.3in | ▲ RT115+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Farmall 120M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Partial power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Farmall 120M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 173in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 88in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 109in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 12,900lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Farmall 120M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 28.1gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,280psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Farmall 120M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Rear 540/1000 | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Power Rating | 120hp | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Farmall 120M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 9,440lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Farmall 120M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Farmall 120M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Farmall 120M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 41st percentile (121 hp)B · 39th percentile (120 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 41st percentile (359 ci)B · 10th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 91st percentile (32)B · 50th percentile (16)
A · RT115B · Farmall 120MMedian Row Crop Tractor