
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT115 vs Challenger MT475B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT475B
Utility
- power
- 124 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO RT115
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT475B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ MT475B higher · +3 hp (+2%)RT115121 hp
MT475B124 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; MT475B is in the 42nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT475B higher · +43 ci (+12%)RT115359 ci
MT475B402 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; MT475B is in the 52nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1156
MT475B6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT115 is in the 50th percentile; MT475B is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ RT115 higher · +16 (+100%)RT11532
MT475B16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
RT115 is in the 91st percentile; MT475B is in the 50th · 1,200 models
RT115 (A)MT475B (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Challenger MT475B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | RT115 | MT475B | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Challenger MT475B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Perkins Diesel | — |
| Model | B5.9T | C6.6 | — |
| Power Output | 121hp | 124hp | ▲ MT475B+3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 359ci | 402ci | ▲ MT475B+43 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.1in | ▲ MT475B+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ MT475B+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Challenger MT475B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (4) range operator controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Challenger MT475B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 173in | 190in | ▲ MT475B+17 in · +10% |
| Width | 88in | 79.3in | ▲ RT115+8.7 in · +11% |
| Height | 109in | 110in | ▲ MT475B+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 12,900lb | 11,795lb | ▲ RT115+1,105 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Challenger MT475B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Open center and closed center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 28.1gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,280psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Challenger MT475B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Power Rating | 120hp | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Challenger MT475B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 9,440lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Challenger MT475B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Challenger MT475B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Challenger MT475B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 41st percentile (121 hp)B · 42nd percentile (124 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 41st percentile (359 ci)B · 52nd percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 91st percentile (32)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 54th percentile (12,900 lb)B · 46th percentile (11,795 lb)
A · RT115B · MT475BMedian Row Crop Tractor