AGCOModel A
AGCO RT120
Row Crop
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 408 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT120 vs CaseIH Puma 150
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 150
Row Crop
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO RT120
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 150
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedRT120150 hp
Puma 150150 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT120 is in the 57th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 57th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 150 higher · +3 ci (<1%)RT120408 ci
Puma 150411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT120 is in the 57th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1206
Puma 1506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT120 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ RT120 higher · +1,155 lb (+8%)RT12015,055 lb
Puma 15013,900 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
RT120 is in the 67th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 62nd · 1,350 models
RT120 (A)Puma 150 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT120 | Puma 150 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | FPT | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Turbocharged with Air-to-Air Aftercooling Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 150hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 408ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 150+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,055lb | 13,900lb | ▲ RT120+1,155 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Rear Type II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 24,251lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 57th percentile (150 hp)B · 57th percentile (150 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 57th percentile (408 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 67th percentile (15,055 lb)B · 62nd percentile (13,900 lb)
A · RT120B · Puma 150Median Row Crop Tractor