AGCOModel A
AGCO RT155A
Row Crop
- power
- 163 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT155A vs CaseIH Puma 165
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 165
Row Crop
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO RT155A
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 165
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 165 higher · +2 hp (+1%)RT155A163 hp
Puma 165165 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT155A is in the 63rd percentile; Puma 165 is in the 65th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 165 higher · +9 ci (+2%)RT155A402 ci
Puma 165411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT155A is in the 52nd percentile; Puma 165 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT155A6
Puma 1656
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT155A is in the 50th percentile; Puma 165 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ RT155A higher · +6 (+33%)RT155A24
Puma 16518
Median Row Crop Tractor16
RT155A is in the 81st percentile; Puma 165 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
RT155A (A)Puma 165 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT155A | Puma 165 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SisuDiesel | CNH / FPT | — |
| Model | 66CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 163hp | 165hp | ▲ Puma 165+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 165+9 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ RT155A+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 165+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range operator controlled powershift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 79.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 119in | 120in | ▲ Puma 165+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 17,725lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Closed center pressure flow compensating | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 30.5gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 20.8-42 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category III/IIIN | II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 63rd percentile (163 hp)B · 65th percentile (165 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 52nd percentile (402 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 61st percentile (18)
Height
median 114 inA · 69th percentile (119 in)B · 71st percentile (120 in)
A · RT155AB · Puma 165Median Row Crop Tractor