AGCOModel A
AGCO RT155A
Row Crop
- power
- 163 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT155A vs Challenger MT565B MFWD
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT565B MFWD
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO RT155A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT565B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ MT565B MFWD higher · +1 ci (<1%)RT155A402 ci
MT565B MFWD403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT155A is in the 52nd percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 56th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT155A6
MT565B MFWD6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT155A is in the 50th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Width
▲ MT565B MFWD higher · +2.5 in (+3%)RT155A79.1 in
MT565B MFWD81.6 in
Median Row Crop Tractor91.2 in
RT155A is in the 20th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 29th · 806 models
Height
▲ MT565B MFWD higher · +5 in (+4%)RT155A119 in
MT565B MFWD124 in
Median Row Crop Tractor114 in
RT155A is in the 69th percentile; MT565B MFWD is in the 82nd · 1,140 models
RT155A (A)MT565B MFWD (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | RT155A | MT565B MFWD | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SisuDiesel | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 66CTA | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 163hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 403ci | ▲ MT565B MFWD+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range operator controlled powershift | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 79.1in | 81.6in | ▲ MT565B MFWD+2.5 in · +3% |
| Height | 119in | 124in | ▲ MT565B MFWD+5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 16,100lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 30.5gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | Category III/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 14,284lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT155A | Challenger MT565B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 52nd percentile (402 ci)B · 56th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Width
median 91.2 inA · 20th percentile (79.1 in)B · 29th percentile (81.6 in)
Height
median 114 inA · 69th percentile (119 in)B · 82nd percentile (124 in)
A · RT155AB · MT565B MFWDMedian Row Crop Tractor