AGCOModel A
AGCO RT180A
Row Crop
- power
- 216 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT180A vs CaseIH Puma 220
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 220
Row Crop
- power
- 220 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO RT180A
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 220
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 220 higher · +4 hp (+2%)RT180A216 hp
Puma 220220 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT180A is in the 81st percentile; Puma 220 is in the 82nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ RT180A higher · +38 ci (+9%)RT180A449 ci
Puma 220411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT180A is in the 77th percentile; Puma 220 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT180A6
Puma 2206
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT180A is in the 50th percentile; Puma 220 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ RT180A higher · +6 (+33%)RT180A24
Puma 22018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
RT180A is in the 81st percentile; Puma 220 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
RT180A (A)Puma 220 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT180A | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT180A | Puma 220 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT180A | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SisuDiesel | FPT | — |
| Model | 74CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 216hp | 220hp | ▲ Puma 220+4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 449ci | 411ci | ▲ RT180A+38 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ RT180A+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.2in | ▲ RT180A+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT180A | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range operator controlled power shift | 18-speed full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT180A | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 210in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 79.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,460lb | 15,900lb | ▲ RT180A+1,560 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT180A | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed center pressure flow compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT180A | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 28,660lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT180A | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Front wheel assist | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT180A | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volts | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | AGCO RT180A | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective Catalytic Reduction | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT180A | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 81st percentile (216 hp)B · 82nd percentile (220 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 77th percentile (449 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 75th percentile (17,460 lb)B · 70th percentile (15,900 lb)
A · RT180AB · Puma 220Median Row Crop Tractor