AGCOModel A
AGCO ST22A
Sub-Compact
- power
- 22.5 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
AGCO ST22A vs Cub Cadet GT 2100
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet GT 2100
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 23 hp
- displacement
- 41.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST22A
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet GT 2100
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ GT 2100 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)ST22A22.5 hp
GT 210023 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
ST22A is in the 35th percentile; GT 2100 is in the 36th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ ST22A higher · +27.4 ci (+67%)ST22A68.5 ci
GT 210041.1 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
ST22A is in the 29th percentile; GT 2100 is in the 4th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ ST22A higher · +1 (+50%)ST22A3
GT 21002
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
ST22A is in the 50th percentile; GT 2100 is in the 11th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ ST22A higher · +879 lb (+122%)ST22A1,600 lb
GT 2100721 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
ST22A is in the 28th percentile; GT 2100 is in the 1st · 711 models
ST22A (A)GT 2100 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST22A | Cub Cadet GT 2100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | ST22A | GT 2100 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST22A | Cub Cadet GT 2100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Kohler | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Command CH680 | — |
| Power Output | 22.5hp | 23hp | ▲ GT 2100+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 3,600RPM | ▲ GT 2100+1,000 RPM · +38% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ ST22A+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 68.5ci | 41.1ci | ▲ ST22A+27.4 ci · +67% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.2in | ▲ GT 2100+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 2.6in | ▲ ST22A+0.5 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST22A | Cub Cadet GT 2100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Shaft-driven Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST22A | Cub Cadet GT 2100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 97.6in | 76in | ▲ ST22A+21.6 in · +28% |
| Width | 45.8in | 42.7in | ▲ ST22A+3.1 in · +7% |
| Height | 72.4in | 47.2in | ▲ ST22A+25.2 in · +53% |
| Operating Weight | 1,600lb | 721lb | ▲ ST22A+879 lb · +122% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST22A | Cub Cadet GT 2100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST22A | Cub Cadet GT 2100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear and Mid PTO | Independent with electric clutch | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST22A | Cub Cadet GT 2100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST22A | Cub Cadet GT 2100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Mechanical Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST22A | Cub Cadet GT 2100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST22A | Cub Cadet GT 2100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Open Operator Station | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 35th percentile (22.5 hp)B · 36th percentile (23 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 29th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 4th percentile (41.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 11th percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 28th percentile (1,600 lb)B · 1st percentile (721 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 26th percentile (97.6 in)B · 3rd percentile (76 in)
A · ST22AB · GT 2100Median Sub-Compact Tractor