Head to head · Sub-Compact

AGCO ST22A vs Cub Cadet GTX 2100

AGCO ST22A Tractor
AGCOModel A

AGCO ST22A

Sub-Compact

power
22.5 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full ST22A specs
Cub Cadet GTX 2100 Tractor
Cub CadetModel B

Cub Cadet GTX 2100

Lawn and Garden

power
23 hp
displacement
41.1 ci
Cylinders
2
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full GTX 2100 specs
AGCOAGCO ST22A
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet GTX 2100

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 584–816

Engine Power

▲ GTX 2100 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)
ST22A22.5 hp
GTX 210023 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

ST22A is in the 35th percentile; GTX 2100 is in the 36th · 816 models

Engine Displacement

▲ ST22A higher · +27.4 ci (+67%)
ST22A68.5 ci
GTX 210041.1 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci

ST22A is in the 29th percentile; GTX 2100 is in the 4th · 757 models

Cylinders

▲ ST22A higher · +1 (+50%)
ST22A3
GTX 21002
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3

ST22A is in the 50th percentile; GTX 2100 is in the 11th · 802 models

Operating Weight

▲ ST22A higher · +879 lb (+122%)
ST22A1,600 lb
GTX 2100721 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb

ST22A is in the 28th percentile; GTX 2100 is in the 1st · 711 models

ST22A (A)GTX 2100 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAGCO ST22ACub Cadet GTX 2100Difference
ManufacturerAGCOCub Cadet—
ModelST22AGTX 2100—
CategorySub-CompactLawn and Garden—

Engine

SpecAGCO ST22ACub Cadet GTX 2100Difference
ManufacturerIsekiKohler—
ModelNot recordedCommand CH680—
Power Output22.5hp23hp▲ GTX 2100+0.5 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,600RPM3,600RPM▲ GTX 2100+1,000 RPM · +38%
Cylinders32▲ ST22A+1 · +50%
Displacement68.5ci41.1ci▲ ST22A+27.4 ci · +67%
Bore3.1in3.2in▲ GTX 2100+0.1 in · +3%
Stroke3.1in2.6in▲ ST22A+0.5 in · +19%

Transmission

SpecAGCO ST22ACub Cadet GTX 2100Difference
TypeHydrostaticHydro-Gear BDU-10 (Shaft-Driven Hydrostatic)—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAGCO ST22ACub Cadet GTX 2100Difference
Length97.6in76in▲ ST22A+21.6 in · +28%
Width45.8in42.7in▲ ST22A+3.1 in · +7%
Height72.4in47.2in▲ ST22A+25.2 in · +53%
Operating Weight1,600lb721lb▲ ST22A+879 lb · +122%

Hydraulics

SpecAGCO ST22ACub Cadet GTX 2100Difference
System TypeOpen centerNot recorded—
Steering TypeNot recordedElectronic Power—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecAGCO ST22ACub Cadet GTX 2100Difference
TypeRear and Mid PTOIndependent With Electric Clutch—
Speed 1540rpmNot recorded—
Speed 22,000rpmNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAGCO ST22ACub Cadet GTX 2100Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAGCO ST22ACub Cadet GTX 2100Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x2 2WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded2WD—
Steering TypeNot recordedElectronic Power—
Brake TypeNot recordedMechanical Disc—

Electrical

SpecAGCO ST22ACub Cadet GTX 2100Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecAGCO ST22ACub Cadet GTX 2100Difference
TypeOpen operator stationOpen Operator StationSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 35th percentile (22.5 hp)B · 36th percentile (23 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 91.4 ci
A · 29th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 4th percentile (41.1 ci)

Cylinders

median 3
A · 50th percentile (3)B · 11th percentile (2)

Operating Weight

median 2,700 lb
A · 28th percentile (1,600 lb)B · 1st percentile (721 lb)

Length

median 113 in
A · 26th percentile (97.6 in)B · 3rd percentile (76 in)
A · ST22AB · GTX 2100Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageAGCO ST22AFull spec pageCub Cadet GTX 2100