AGCOModel A
AGCO ST32
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST32 vs Challenger MT265B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT265B
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
AGCOAGCO ST32
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedST3233 hp
MT265B33 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST32 is in the 25th percentile; MT265B is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedST3291.4 ci
MT265B91.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST32 is in the 18th percentile; MT265B is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST323
MT265B3
Median Utility Tractor4
ST32 is in the 23rd percentile; MT265B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT265B higher · +494 lb (+19%)ST322,642 lb
MT265B3,136 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
ST32 is in the 18th percentile; MT265B is in the 25th · 5,107 models
ST32 (A)MT265B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | ST32 | MT265B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | E3CD-VB40 | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 33hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 91.4ci | Same |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | SynchroShuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 121in | ▲ MT265B+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 51in | 62.2in | ▲ MT265B+11.2 in · +22% |
| Height | 79.3in | 87.4in | ▲ MT265B+8.1 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 2,642lb | 3,136lb | ▲ MT265B+494 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,535lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Four Wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 18th percentile (2,642 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,136 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 23rd percentile (117 in)B · 28th percentile (121 in)
A · ST32B · MT265BMedian Utility Tractor