Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST35 vs CaseIH Farmall 30C
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 30C
Utility
- power
- 32.2 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO ST35
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 30C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ ST35 higher · +0.8 hp (+2%)ST3533 hp
Farmall 30C32.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST35 is in the 25th percentile; Farmall 30C is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ ST35 higher · +0.1 ci (<1%)ST3591.4 ci
Farmall 30C91.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST35 is in the 18th percentile; Farmall 30C is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST353
Farmall 30C3
Median Utility Tractor4
ST35 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 30C is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ ST35 higher · +4 (+33%)ST3516
Farmall 30C12
Median Utility Tractor12
ST35 is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 30C is in the 50th · 4,941 models
ST35 (A)Farmall 30C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | ST35 | Farmall 30C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Shibaura | — |
| Model | E3CD | N843T-F-24 | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 32.2hp | ▲ ST35+0.8 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 91.3ci | ▲ ST35+0.1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.3in | ▲ ST35+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.5in | ▲ Farmall 30C+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized Shuttle | Synchronized Shuttle | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 119in | ▲ ST35+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 56.3in | 66.4in | ▲ Farmall 30C+10.1 in · +18% |
| Height | 93.5in | 93.6in | ▲ Farmall 30C+0.1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 3,168lb | 3,218lb | ▲ Farmall 30C+50 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear PTO: 540, Mid PTO: SAE 15 1.0 | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Rear Type I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 25th percentile (32.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 25th percentile (3,168 lb)B · 26th percentile (3,218 lb)
A · ST35B · Farmall 30CMedian Utility Tractor