Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 30C
Utility
- power
- 32.2 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 30C vs LS XR3032H
Image not recorded
LSModel B
LS XR3032H
Utility
- power
- 32.2 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 30C
vs
LSLS XR3032H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedFarmall 30C32.2 hp
XR3032H32.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 30C is in the 25th percentile; XR3032H is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedFarmall 30C91.3 ci
XR3032H91.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 30C is in the 17th percentile; XR3032H is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 30C3
XR3032H3
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 30C is in the 23rd percentile; XR3032H is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ XR3032H higher · +2 lb (<1%)Farmall 30C3,218 lb
XR3032H3,220 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Farmall 30C is in the 26th percentile; XR3032H is in the 26th · 5,107 models
Farmall 30C (A)XR3032H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 30C | LS XR3032H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | LS | — |
| Model | Farmall 30C | XR3032H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 30C | LS XR3032H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibarua | — |
| Model | N843T-F-24 | N843T-F | — |
| Power Output | 32.2hp | 32.2hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.3ci | 91.3ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 30C | LS XR3032H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized Shuttle | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 30C | LS XR3032H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 121in | ▲ XR3032H+2 in · +2% |
| Width | 66.4in | 60in | ▲ Farmall 30C+6.4 in · +11% |
| Height | 93.6in | 90in | ▲ Farmall 30C+3.6 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 3,218lb | 3,220lb | ▲ XR3032H+2 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 30C | LS XR3032H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 30C | LS XR3032H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 30C | LS XR3032H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | MFWD 4WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 30C | LS XR3032H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 30C | LS XR3032H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | EGR | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 30C | LS XR3032H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (32.2 hp)B · 25th percentile (32.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 26th percentile (3,218 lb)B · 26th percentile (3,220 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 26th percentile (119 in)B · 28th percentile (121 in)
A · Farmall 30CB · XR3032HMedian Utility Tractor