Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST35 vs Yanmar EF233H
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar EF233H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 32.5 hp
- displacement
- 100 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST35
vs
YanmarYanmar EF233H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ ST35 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)ST3533 hp
EF233H32.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST35 is in the 25th percentile; EF233H is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ EF233H higher · +8.6 ci (+9%)ST3591.4 ci
EF233H100 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST35 is in the 18th percentile; EF233H is in the 22nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST353
EF233H3
Median Utility Tractor4
ST35 is in the 23rd percentile; EF233H is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ ST35 higher · +1,018 lb (+47%)ST353,168 lb
EF233H2,150 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
ST35 is in the 25th percentile; EF233H is in the 13th · 5,107 models
ST35 (A)EF233H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Yanmar | — |
| Model | ST35 | EF233H | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | E3CD | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 32.5hp | ▲ ST35+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ ST35+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 100ci | ▲ EF233H+8.6 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized Shuttle | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 115in | ▲ ST35+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 56.3in | 51.8in | ▲ ST35+4.5 in · +9% |
| Height | 93.5in | 78.7in | ▲ ST35+14.8 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | 3,168lb | 2,150lb | ▲ ST35+1,018 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear PTO: 540, Mid PTO: SAE 15 1.0 | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar EF233H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open station with ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 25th percentile (32.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 22nd percentile (100 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 25th percentile (3,168 lb)B · 13th percentile (2,150 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 29th percentile (122 in)B · 20th percentile (115 in)
A · ST35B · EF233HMedian Utility Tractor