Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST35 vs Yanmar FX32D
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FX32D
Utility
- power
- 32 hp
- displacement
- 100 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST35
vs
YanmarYanmar FX32D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ ST35 higher · +1 hp (+3%)ST3533 hp
FX32D32 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST35 is in the 25th percentile; FX32D is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FX32D higher · +8.6 ci (+9%)ST3591.4 ci
FX32D100 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST35 is in the 18th percentile; FX32D is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FX32D higher · +1 (+33%)ST353
FX32D4
Median Utility Tractor4
ST35 is in the 23rd percentile; FX32D is in the 50th · 5,720 models
ST35 (A)FX32D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Yanmar | — |
| Model | ST35 | FX32D | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | E3CD | 4TNA78 | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 32hp | ▲ ST35+1 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ FX32D+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 100ci | ▲ FX32D+8.6 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.1in | ▲ ST35+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.4in | ▲ FX32D+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized Shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 56.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 93.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,168lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear PTO: 540, Mid PTO: SAE 15 1.0 | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 24th percentile (32 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 23rd percentile (100 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · ST35B · FX32DMedian Utility Tractor