AgcoModel A
Agco ST52a
Sub-Compact
- power
- 52.1 hp
- displacement
- 174 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Agco ST52a vs Challenger MT295B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT295B
Utility
- power
- 52.1 hp
- displacement
- 180 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
AgcoAgco ST52a
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT295B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedST52a52.1 hp
MT295B52.1 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
ST52a is in the 91st percentile; MT295B is in the 91st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT295B higher · +6 ci (+3%)ST52a174 ci
MT295B180 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
ST52a is in the 91st percentile; MT295B is in the 93rd · 757 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedST52a8
MT295B8
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
ST52a is in the 40th percentile; MT295B is in the 40th · 616 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT295B higher · +232 lb (+7%)ST52a3,494 lb
MT295B3,726 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
ST52a is in the 66th percentile; MT295B is in the 71st · 711 models
ST52a (A)MT295B (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | Challenger | — |
| Model | ST52a | MT295B | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Iseki | — |
| Model | Not recorded | E4DD | — |
| Power Output | 52.1hp | 52.1hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 174ci | 180ci | ▲ MT295B+6 ci · +3% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.8in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 8x8 synchro shuttle | SynchroShuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 133in | — |
| Width | 66in | 65.4in | ▲ ST52a+0.6 in · <1% |
| Height | 91.2in | 89.1in | ▲ ST52a+2.1 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,494lb | 3,726lb | ▲ MT295B+232 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Cat I | Three Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,087lb | 3,086lb | ▲ ST52a+1 lb · <1% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 91st percentile (52.1 hp)B · 91st percentile (52.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 91st percentile (174 ci)B · 93rd percentile (180 ci)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 40th percentile (8)B · 40th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 66th percentile (3,494 lb)B · 71st percentile (3,726 lb)
Width
median 50.7 inA · 90th percentile (66 in)B · 87th percentile (65.4 in)
A · ST52aB · MT295BMedian Sub-Compact Tractor