Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST55 vs Volvo 2200
Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST55
vs
VolvoVolvo 2200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 2200 higher · +0.4 hp (<1%)ST5555.6 hp
220056 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST55 is in the 50th percentile; 2200 is in the 51st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2200 higher · +63 ci (+36%)ST55173 ci
2200236 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST55 is in the 46th percentile; 2200 is in the 64th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST554
22004
Median Utility Tractor4
ST55 is in the 50th percentile; 2200 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2200 higher · +4 (+33%)ST5512
220016
Median Utility Tractor12
ST55 is in the 50th percentile; 2200 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
ST55 (A)2200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Volvo | — |
| Model | ST55 | 2200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Volvo | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D39T | — |
| Power Output | 55.6hp | 56hp | ▲ 2200+0.4 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ ST55+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 236ci | ▲ 2200+63 ci · +36% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro shuttle | Synchromesh and two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 137in | 146in | ▲ 2200+9 in · +7% |
| Width | 72.7in | 73.6in | ▲ 2200+0.9 in · +1% |
| Height | 98.8in | 100in | ▲ 2200+1.2 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 4,417lb | 6,493lb | ▲ 2200+2,076 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 50th percentile (55.6 hp)B · 51st percentile (56 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 64th percentile (236 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 42nd percentile (4,417 lb)B · 61st percentile (6,493 lb)
A · ST55B · 2200Median Utility Tractor