Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST60A vs CaseIH CS 48
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH CS 48
Sub-Compact
- power
- 48 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO ST60A
vs
CaseIHCaseIH CS 48
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CS 48 higher · +1.6 hp (+3%)ST60A46.4 hp
CS 4848 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST60A is in the 41st percentile; CS 48 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ ST60A higher · +15 ci (+9%)ST60A180 ci
CS 48165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST60A is in the 49th percentile; CS 48 is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ ST60A higher · +1 (+33%)ST60A4
CS 483
Median Utility Tractor4
ST60A is in the 50th percentile; CS 48 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ CS 48 higher · +4 (+33%)ST60A12
CS 4816
Median Utility Tractor12
ST60A is in the 50th percentile; CS 48 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
ST60A (A)CS 48 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST60A | CaseIH CS 48 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | ST60A | CS 48 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST60A | CaseIH CS 48 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 903.27 | — |
| Power Output | 46.4hp | 48hp | ▲ CS 48+1.6 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ ST60A+350 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ ST60A+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 180ci | 165ci | ▲ ST60A+15 ci · +9% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.7in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST60A | CaseIH CS 48 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Powershuttle, QuadraShift | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST60A | CaseIH CS 48 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 135in | 139in | ▲ CS 48+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 68.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.7in | 92.1in | ▲ CS 48+0.4 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 4,078lb | 5,976lb | ▲ CS 48+1,898 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST60A | CaseIH CS 48 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST60A | CaseIH CS 48 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST60A | CaseIH CS 48 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST60A | CaseIH CS 48 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab with ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (46.4 hp)B · 43rd percentile (48 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (180 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 38th percentile (4,078 lb)B · 56th percentile (5,976 lb)
A · ST60AB · CS 48Median Utility Tractor